Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jil Teichmann vs Petra Martic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Teichmann vs Martic analysis and find out who is favored!
Jil Teichmann vs Petra Martic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Teichmann 1 - 0 Martic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Teichmann has won 48.86% of points on his second serve, while Martic has won 44.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Teichmann, in recent form, has won 55.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martic has won 50.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.02% and 34.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Teichmann has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martic has saved 51.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Teichmann has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Martic winning 44.74% (W/L 17/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Teichmann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Martic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 172/ 98), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 165/ 151).
- Player level: In the last year, Teichmann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 17/ 9), where as Martic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Teichmann winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Teichmann winning 2 and Martic winning 0. The last match between Teichmann and Martic was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 17-01-2022, First, Hard with Jil Teichmann getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Teichmann and Martic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Teichmann winning 0 times and Martic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Teichmann winning 0, and Martic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Teichmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.74 while Martic has played against players with an average rank of 106.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Teichmann has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martic has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Teichmann has converted 46.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martic has converted 47.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
214
Rank
21
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
81
Rank
14
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
57% (300-224)
Career Total W/L
57% (422-317)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$1,804,551
Career Prize Money
$5,732,563
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jil Teichmann | Petra Martic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) | 55% (32/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (29/37) | 59% (19/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (28/58) | 32% (18/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Jil Teichmann
Player
Petra Martic
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jil Teichmann | Petra Martic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 38% (6/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (34/20) | 41% (16/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (261/203) | 47% (178/197) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 81% (13/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 79 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:34 | 1:53:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.88 | 120.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1003/1531) | 59% (697/1176) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (630/1003) | 68% (475/697) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (258/528) | 44% (212/479) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (97/208) | 48% (52/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (737/1571) | 40% (472/1193) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (16/23) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 18% (11/2) |
Jil Teichmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Jil Teichmann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Sijia Wei
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Jil Teichmann
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Iva Primorac
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Simona Waltert
72%
(
81 of
113)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
57 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Dora Miskovic
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
82%
(
81 of
99)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Petra Martic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Petra Martic
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Petra Martic
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Petra Martic
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Petra Martic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Petra Martic
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Petra Martic
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Caroline Dolehide
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Petra Martic
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Teichmann Vs Martic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Petra Martic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
